I've removed the ppc64el and s390x binaries, since the build-dependencies are not satisfiable on these archs and the architecture removal has propagated to Debian testing.
riscv64 is a different matter, the build-dependencies are satisfiable there but the package failed to build; and riscv64 is not a Debian architecture so we can't follow their lead. Is there another reason we should remove the riscv64 binary instead of fixing the build failure?
I've removed the ppc64el and s390x binaries, since the build-dependencies are not satisfiable on these archs and the architecture removal has propagated to Debian testing.
riscv64 is a different matter, the build-dependencies are satisfiable there but the package failed to build; and riscv64 is not a Debian architecture so we can't follow their lead. Is there another reason we should remove the riscv64 binary instead of fixing the build failure?