Comment 9 for bug 886365

Hi Chris,

This looks okay at first glance. I haven't done a full review of it, but the approach is certainly better, and it's good to be able do include a custom storage-schemas.conf. I'm not sure about how we'd plan to be able to update that as there's no mechanism to deliver an updated version as far as I can see. Would there be any chance of updating it to allow for a mechanism to deliver an updated storage-schemas.conf file if needed?

Thanks, Tom