First of all, thanks for submitting a Discourse charm to the Charm Store. I believe it will be a great addition to the current collection of charms.
I have taken a first look at the branch and have found a couple things:
* It does not have tests. Currently, charms proposed for trusty need to have tests in order to be included on the charm store.
* config.yaml values don't contain a default value. In order for `charm proof`, our linting tool, to pass, all values in config.yaml must contain a default. You can use `default: "" ` for blank and `default:` for a NoneType value.
* It needs to contain a copyright file, and needs to be licensed under an open source license
Based on that, I am moving this bug to 'Incomplete'. Please move it to New or Fix Committed once it's ready for another review. Thanks again for your efforts in the Discourse charm!
Hey, Nate!
First of all, thanks for submitting a Discourse charm to the Charm Store. I believe it will be a great addition to the current collection of charms.
I have taken a first look at the branch and have found a couple things:
* It does not have tests. Currently, charms proposed for trusty need to have tests in order to be included on the charm store.
* config.yaml values don't contain a default value. In order for `charm proof`, our linting tool, to pass, all values in config.yaml must contain a default. You can use `default: "" ` for blank and `default:` for a NoneType value.
* It needs to contain a copyright file, and needs to be licensed under an open source license
Based on that, I am moving this bug to 'Incomplete'. Please move it to New or Fix Committed once it's ready for another review. Thanks again for your efforts in the Discourse charm!