I committed those changes. pngmath is not part of sphinx any more,
so the change is really necessary....
Anton
Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019 um 18:25 Uhr schrieb Robert Caulk
<email address hidden>:
>
> Yes, Mathjax seems cleaner. Does it result in better resolution of math
> on the web. The old equations used to look grainy with pngmath iirc.
>
> Is there a way to test changes and their effect on the website without
> merging to develop branch?
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to Yade.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814286
>
> Title:
> Various LaTeX symbols missing in Yade documentation
>
> Status in Yade:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> See [1]. Looks like the builder is missing some important LaTeX
> libraries.
>
>
> [1] https://yade-dev.gitlab.io/trunk/formulation.html#variables
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/yade/+bug/1814286/+subscriptions
Hi guys,
I committed those changes. pngmath is not part of sphinx any more,
so the change is really necessary....
Anton
Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019 um 18:25 Uhr schrieb Robert Caulk /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1814286 /yade-dev. gitlab. io/trunk/ formulation. html#variables /bugs.launchpad .net/yade/ +bug/1814286/ +subscriptions
<email address hidden>:
>
> Yes, Mathjax seems cleaner. Does it result in better resolution of math
> on the web. The old equations used to look grainy with pngmath iirc.
>
> Is there a way to test changes and their effect on the website without
> merging to develop branch?
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to Yade.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> Various LaTeX symbols missing in Yade documentation
>
> Status in Yade:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> See [1]. Looks like the builder is missing some important LaTeX
> libraries.
>
>
> [1] https:/
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/