Right of course. I am doing this right now every 15 minutes, and I
forgot to tell Robert about that ;)
There is also `make doc/fast` but I didn't notice any difference.
Chareyre said: (by the date of Fri, 01 Feb 2019 19:25:57 -0000)
> This is not website-related. You can simply «make doc» locally and check
> html output.
> It is a good opportunity to play with gitlab pipeline, still, but it will
> also imply ~8min of full recompile time...
> B
>
> Le ven. 1 févr. 2019 18:20, Robert Caulk <email address hidden> a
> écrit :
>
> > Yes, Mathjax seems cleaner. Does it result in better resolution of math
> > on the web. The old equations used to look grainy with pngmath iirc.
> >
> > Is there a way to test changes and their effect on the website without
> > merging to develop branch?
Right of course. I am doing this right now every 15 minutes, and I
forgot to tell Robert about that ;)
There is also `make doc/fast` but I didn't notice any difference.
Chareyre said: (by the date of Fri, 01 Feb 2019 19:25:57 -0000)
> This is not website-related. You can simply «make doc» locally and check
> html output.
> It is a good opportunity to play with gitlab pipeline, still, but it will
> also imply ~8min of full recompile time...
> B
>
> Le ven. 1 févr. 2019 18:20, Robert Caulk <email address hidden> a
> écrit :
>
> > Yes, Mathjax seems cleaner. Does it result in better resolution of math
> > on the web. The old equations used to look grainy with pngmath iirc.
> >
> > Is there a way to test changes and their effect on the website without
> > merging to develop branch?
-- janek.kozicki. pl/ |
Janek Kozicki http://