Support for copy with + or * providing concatentation is covered under bugs 26943 and 27899, which I have just sent in a patchset for, so renaming this bug to the residual problem of support for CON (and CON:) and is similar to 21394 which reports the same issue using NUL (and NUL:)
Support for copy with + or * providing concatentation is covered under bugs 26943 and 27899, which I have just sent in a patchset for, so renaming this bug to the residual problem of support for CON (and CON:) and is similar to 21394 which reports the same issue using NUL (and NUL:)