I'm not sure I fully understand your explanation. But if you add five children, isn't there one FAMC update on each child and five on the family (if you do it once on each child). While here (if it would work as it's own text says, and as it did work at one time in the past), you still update each child once, and (maybe, if we're clever) _once_ on the family (adding all five CHIL links at once)?
In any case, there was a time when it worked the way the text above the table says.
And, IMHO, having the blank change to "undefined" after you select the child is a bug itself.
If the behavior is not to be changed, then the text should change to reflect the new behavior.
(Also, "the link to family" on the INDI's relatives tab is broken at the moment—I reported it earlier, but either the submit failed or the e-mail back to me failed.)
I'm not sure I fully understand your explanation. But if you add five children, isn't there one FAMC update on each child and five on the family (if you do it once on each child). While here (if it would work as it's own text says, and as it did work at one time in the past), you still update each child once, and (maybe, if we're clever) _once_ on the family (adding all five CHIL links at once)?
In any case, there was a time when it worked the way the text above the table says.
And, IMHO, having the blank change to "undefined" after you select the child is a bug itself.
If the behavior is not to be changed, then the text should change to reflect the new behavior.
(Also, "the link to family" on the INDI's relatives tab is broken at the moment—I reported it earlier, but either the submit failed or the e-mail back to me failed.)