> The part for receiving mail is done, see revision 637 in my
> ~ulm/vm/experimental branch. There are two new boolean variables vm-
> honor-mail-followup-to and vm-honor-mail-reply-to.
Should we set these to t by default? Most users won't bother
otherwise.
> - If vm-honor-mail-followup-to is non-nil,
> and the "To" address is found in a list of subscribed mailing lists
> (follow thunderbird and call it vm-subscribed-mailing-lists?)
> then add a MFT header containing the "To" address.
Yeah, that sounds right.
> - If vm-honor-mail-reply-to is non-nil,
> and the "To" address is found in vm-reply-ignored-reply-tos,
> then add a MRT header containing:
> - the address from mail-default-reply-to (if it exists),
> or the vm-mail-header-from address.
Ok, that sounds Thunderbirdish. But I think
vm-reply-ignored-reply-tos is a very confusing name. I never knew
what it was for. Why don't we rename it to
vm-reply-to-mangling-mailing-lists?
Hi Ulrich, Great to see things moving again!
> The part for receiving mail is done, see revision 637 in my experimental branch. There are two new boolean variables vm- followup- to and vm-honor- mail-reply- to.
> ~ulm/vm/
> honor-mail-
Should we set these to t by default? Most users won't bother
otherwise.
> - If vm-honor- mail-followup- to is non-nil, mailing- lists?)
> and the "To" address is found in a list of subscribed mailing lists
> (follow thunderbird and call it vm-subscribed-
> then add a MFT header containing the "To" address.
Yeah, that sounds right.
> - If vm-honor- mail-reply- to is non-nil, ignored- reply-tos, reply-to (if it exists),
> and the "To" address is found in vm-reply-
> then add a MRT header containing:
> - the address from mail-default-
> or the vm-mail-header-from address.
Ok, that sounds Thunderbirdish. But I think ignored- reply-tos is a very confusing name. I never knew to-mangling- mailing- lists?
vm-reply-
what it was for. Why don't we rename it to
vm-reply-
Cheers,
Uday