Virtualenv

  1. Bug #248558
  2. Comment #22

Comment 22 for bug 248558

Revision history for this message
In , Thomas (thomas-redhat-bugs) wrote :

(In reply to comment #13)
> Well, if that works and the extra paths are not harming anything, I'm fine with
> using that patch ... at least for now.

Did you talk to upstream about this problem already? Maybe they have some idea how to cleanly solve it.

> modified version of the patch (- original virtualenv site.py, + my changes to
> the original virtualenv setup.py)....

That code looks far more complicated to me than it needs to be, but if it works *shrug*.

Maybe Ignacio can comment?