Comment 153 for bug 1073433
Revision history for this message
| Christian Niemeyer (christian-niemeyer) wrote | #153 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
513534c
demo site
(Get the code!)
Regardless of that one comment above. But it is really frustrating if now the user's of ubuntu get blamed for not filing the correct bug. Dear folks at Canonical, you have so much information in this one thread, about how to reproduce this error. I'm not that experienced. So please, could someone reproduce this error (take a machine without any wireless capabilities) and then file the correct bug, if this bug report here is not "good enough" for you.
It's pretty amazing that a bug that causes **filesystem errors** (if minor or not minor) does not get fixed at all and now the users get partly blamed for not filing the bug on the correct package? Hello? A default installation causes filesystem errors, reproduceable. Would someone please take those hints in this thread seriously? Like: install on a machine with a wired connection on no wireless adapters. I can reproduce this 100%.
My fix is (taken from this thread): "console none" in /etc/init/
And more important in /etc/init/umountfs adding the following lines in the beginning of the file:
service networking stop
sleep 1
service networking start
sleep 1
service networking stop
sleep 1
killall dhclient
sleep 1
That worked for me. I don't know what package to file this bug against, because it seems that it happens out of certain hardware and interaction between different packages. I'm not blaming upstart at all. I just want this CRITICAL bug to be fixed. It is around since 12.04/12.10. That's "amazing".