Mikkel, thanks for the creative suggestion. However, I think we need a
more predictable solution. From a design perspective:
* if this is a random selection, it should say so
* if there are in fact more available (even if we don't know how many)
that should be clear
* the expansion mechanism should be consistent
So, I think this will require an API change, and we should defer it to
Oneiric.
Mikkel, thanks for the creative suggestion. However, I think we need a
more predictable solution. From a design perspective:
* if this is a random selection, it should say so
* if there are in fact more available (even if we don't know how many)
that should be clear
* the expansion mechanism should be consistent
So, I think this will require an API change, and we should defer it to
Oneiric.
Mark