On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Robert Collins
<email address hidden> wrote:
> It would also make it harder to tell that it is udd doing things,
> which is quite nice for us. Please consider at a minimum setting a
> custom user agent if you start using anonymous access. However,
> ideally, I'd say keep using authenticated access.
>
In the API at least, anonymous access still requires specifying the
app name. Also, there's more than one udd instance out there doing
things unrelated to udd.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Robert Collins
<email address hidden> wrote:
> It would also make it harder to tell that it is udd doing things,
> which is quite nice for us. Please consider at a minimum setting a
> custom user agent if you start using anonymous access. However,
> ideally, I'd say keep using authenticated access.
>
In the API at least, anonymous access still requires specifying the
app name. Also, there's more than one udd instance out there doing
things unrelated to udd.
jml