On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 4:31 PM Simon Déziel <email address hidden>
wrote:
> Yes, I've been using "-sandbox on" since at least Trusty and filled a
> few bugs about this feature in the past. I've replied to the "call for
> testing" email you sent but maybe my response is being delayed somehow.
>
Thanks, I have seen the reply now.
Having feedback so fast is great and an indicator that we really want to
tackle Bionic.
I agree with you that Trusty should be "won't fix" but I would have hope
> that Xenial would be easier/less risky to fix ;)
>
No Xenial isn't easy either :-/
The big change was to switch from a whitelist (which often had issues with
uncommon setups) to a blacklist based approach.
And that change in terms of Ubuntu Releases was Xenial->Bionic.
So my current stance would be, give the ML some time if more people show
up, but considering the Bionic fix more likely to eventually take place.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 4:31 PM Simon Déziel <email address hidden>
wrote:
> Yes, I've been using "-sandbox on" since at least Trusty and filled a
> few bugs about this feature in the past. I've replied to the "call for
> testing" email you sent but maybe my response is being delayed somehow.
>
Thanks, I have seen the reply now.
Having feedback so fast is great and an indicator that we really want to
tackle Bionic.
I agree with you that Trusty should be "won't fix" but I would have hope
> that Xenial would be easier/less risky to fix ;)
>
No Xenial isn't easy either :-/
The big change was to switch from a whitelist (which often had issues with
uncommon setups) to a blacklist based approach.
And that change in terms of Ubuntu Releases was Xenial->Bionic.
So my current stance would be, give the ML some time if more people show
up, but considering the Bionic fix more likely to eventually take place.