> to make it clear, there never was a "no-change rebuild". no, > ppc64el isn't a regression, it successfully built in the updates > test rebuild.
Ok, thanks for the clarification. I somehow had the impression that http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-rebuild-20150317-updates-trusty.html was a rebuild with the stock toolchain, but a quick look at build logs shows that this was not the case.
So I agree that the firefox and gcc-4.7 build failures are not issues.
> to make it clear, there never was a "no-change rebuild". no,
> ppc64el isn't a regression, it successfully built in the updates
> test rebuild.
Ok, thanks for the clarification. I somehow had the impression that http:// people. ubuntuwire. org/~wgrant/ rebuild- ftbfs-test/ test-rebuild- 20150317- updates- trusty. html was a rebuild with the stock toolchain, but a quick look at build logs shows that this was not the case.
So I agree that the firefox and gcc-4.7 build failures are not issues.