Comment 10 for bug 1065276

Revision history for this message
dan wendlandt (danwent) wrote :

I see this as well, its just that the memory grows a bit more slowly than without the change. \\

Can you measure the peak memory that you reach when this patch is and is not applied? When it is NOT applied, I see 1.4 GB. When it is applied, i see 0.9 GB, which seems like a step in the right direction.