On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 04:30:46PM -0000, Walter Garcia-Fontes wrote:
> Sorry, I meant please check if bug 985049 is related to this bug and can
> be duplicated here.
It is not. If it had been, the apport retracer would have automatically
marked it as a duplicate.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 04:30:46PM -0000, Walter Garcia-Fontes wrote:
> Sorry, I meant please check if bug 985049 is related to this bug and can
> be duplicated here.
It is not. If it had been, the apport retracer would have automatically
marked it as a duplicate.