Comment 3 for bug 1918583

Now that jammy's out (which still includes CONFIG_GPIO_SYSFS), let's at least consider this for kinetic. I would suggest it would sensible to at least try this in an interim release prior to the next LTS. There will undoubtedly be things that break, but it's probably better to be aware of how much breakage potential there is around this (and what it would take to encourage users over to libgpiod, or if that's practical in all cases).

I'll add linux-raspi to the target list as that's probably the kernel flavour that this will impact most and target to kinetic.