Will it be worse than what we have now?
Will evince's postinst fail when it reloads the profile with the above line, and snap_browsers is not defined?
Will it crash when a link in a pdf is clicked?
It's taking a bit to setup a jammy desktop vm to try this, and I have other SRUs to process. Georgia, could you elaborate on what would happen if the new evince were to be installed with an old apparmor that knows nothing about the snap_browsers profile?
> Do we need evince to be reuploaded for jammy there since the previous upload was rejected by Steve?
I'm trying to see what type of error we get if we load a profile with such a rule and the target profile does not exist:
/{,snap/ core/[0- 9]*/,snap/ snapd/[ 0-9]*/} usr/bin/ snap mrCx -> snap_browsers,
Will it be worse than what we have now?
Will evince's postinst fail when it reloads the profile with the above line, and snap_browsers is not defined?
Will it crash when a link in a pdf is clicked?
It's taking a bit to setup a jammy desktop vm to try this, and I have other SRUs to process. Georgia, could you elaborate on what would happen if the new evince were to be installed with an old apparmor that knows nothing about the snap_browsers profile?