[Impact]
test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh should not be failing anymore (except if it's a config related issue) with patches submitted for I-5.13 / F-oem-5.14 in bug 1871015
We should remove the SAUCE patches that mark "vxlan_under_vrf" failure as expected failure to catch regressions in the future.
[Fix]
Revert the following patches:
* UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Make test for VXLAN underlay in non-default VRF an expected failure
* UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Don't fail test_vxlan_under_vrf on xfail
[Test]
[Where problems could occur]
Change limit to test cases, should not have any real impact to any
kernel functions. We may see failures reported from this test in
our SRU regression-testing report in the future, but it means we're
doing the right thing.
[Impact] under_vrf. sh should not be failing anymore (except if it's a config related issue) with patches submitted for I-5.13 / F-oem-5.14 in bug 1871015
test_vxlan_
We should remove the SAUCE patches that mark "vxlan_under_vrf" failure as expected failure to catch regressions in the future.
[Fix] under_vrf on xfail
Revert the following patches:
* UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Make test for VXLAN underlay in non-default VRF an expected failure
* UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Don't fail test_vxlan_
[Test]
[Where problems could occur]
Change limit to test cases, should not have any real impact to any
kernel functions. We may see failures reported from this test in
our SRU regression-testing report in the future, but it means we're
doing the right thing.