>The real fix is to get the gnutls people to support certificate
>directories, like OpenSSL. Why the rush to convert to gnutls
>when it has so many issues. (Licencing issues are low on my list of
>reasons.)
Indeed, for a security tool you want a package written by experienced security developers, not a science project. This isn't a game after all. GnuTLS doesn't even merit a version number greater than 0.5, IMO.
Doug Engert wrote:
>The real fix is to get the gnutls people to support certificate
>directories, like OpenSSL. Why the rush to convert to gnutls
>when it has so many issues. (Licencing issues are low on my list of
>reasons.)
Indeed, for a security tool you want a package written by experienced security developers, not a science project. This isn't a game after all. GnuTLS doesn't even merit a version number greater than 0.5, IMO.
http:// www.openldap. org/lists/ openldap- devel/200802/ msg00072. html