On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:21:58PM -0000, Doug Engert wrote:
> The real fix is to get the gnutls people to support certificate
> directories, like OpenSSL. Why the rush to convert to gnutls
> when it has so many issues. (Licencing issues are low on my list of
> reasons.)
Licensing was the main motivation to move to 2.4 and GnuTLS. The other
option was to keep the client libraries to 2.1.
> > If the system running slapd is on hardy (or intrepid or jaunty) you
> > should also add all of the CA certificates to the server certificate
> > file - this is to workaround a bug where the slapd daemon doesn't send
> > all of the CA certificates to the client.
>
> All or just the intermediate certificates?
>
The intermediate certificates should be enough. If not all of them
should work.
> Another issue with gnutls, no intermediate file (or directory) of
> certificates.
>
Please open a new bug to track this specific issue.
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:21:58PM -0000, Doug Engert wrote:
> The real fix is to get the gnutls people to support certificate
> directories, like OpenSSL. Why the rush to convert to gnutls
> when it has so many issues. (Licencing issues are low on my list of
> reasons.)
Licensing was the main motivation to move to 2.4 and GnuTLS. The other
option was to keep the client libraries to 2.1.
> > If the system running slapd is on hardy (or intrepid or jaunty) you
> > should also add all of the CA certificates to the server certificate
> > file - this is to workaround a bug where the slapd daemon doesn't send
> > all of the CA certificates to the client.
>
> All or just the intermediate certificates?
>
The intermediate certificates should be enough. If not all of them
should work.
> Another issue with gnutls, no intermediate file (or directory) of
> certificates.
>
Please open a new bug to track this specific issue.
-- www.ubuntu. com
Mathias Gug
Ubuntu Developer http://