This is with cubic:
limit = max(2 * skb->truesize, sk->sk_pacing_rate >> 6); min 123.00 max 220.00 avg 194.81 num 80
and reno:
limit = max(2 * skb->truesize, sk->sk_pacing_rate >> 6); min 129.00 max 224.00 avg 192.71 num 80
I suspect that iperf/iperf3 might not be a good (representative) test after all. For example, the difference with wget is not so dramatic.
This is with cubic:
limit = max(2 * skb->truesize, sk->sk_pacing_rate >> 6);
min 123.00 max 220.00 avg 194.81 num 80
and reno:
limit = max(2 * skb->truesize, sk->sk_pacing_rate >> 6);
min 129.00 max 224.00 avg 192.71 num 80
I suspect that iperf/iperf3 might not be a good (representative) test after all. For example, the difference with wget is not so dramatic.