Hi Ilya, yepp, breaking libxml2 is of course an issue.
Regarding the fix/patch, you attached here a patch named 'patch-1.2.11'.
We have currently the following package versions in the archive:
1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.5 | focal
1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu9.2 | jammy
1.2.11.dfsg-4.1ubuntu1 | kinetic
1.2.13.dfsg-1ubuntu3 | lunar-proposed
(After having tweaked the patch a bit regarding white-spaces...)
the patch applies fine on focal, jammy and kinetic.
I wondered if the patch is also for 1.2.13 (I think so, since the RH bug tells that), which is what we currently have in lunar-proposed - and it actually applies there fine too.
I just needed to open a separate LP bug for this, since I need a separate bug number to reference this fix/patch in the changelogs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2002511
So regarding the libxml(2) issue, the further work and communication will be there.
Hi Ilya, yepp, breaking libxml2 is of course an issue.
Regarding the fix/patch, you attached here a patch named 'patch-1.2.11'.
We have currently the following package versions in the archive: dfsg-2ubuntu1. 5 | focal dfsg-2ubuntu9. 2 | jammy dfsg-4. 1ubuntu1 | kinetic dfsg-1ubuntu3 | lunar-proposed
1.2.11.
1.2.11.
1.2.11.
1.2.13.
(After having tweaked the patch a bit regarding white-spaces...)
the patch applies fine on focal, jammy and kinetic.
I wondered if the patch is also for 1.2.13 (I think so, since the RH bug tells that), which is what we currently have in lunar-proposed - and it actually applies there fine too.
I just needed to open a separate LP bug for this, since I need a separate bug number to reference this fix/patch in the changelogs: /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 2002511
https:/
So regarding the libxml(2) issue, the further work and communication will be there.