Ubuntu
xulrunner-1.9.1 package

  1. Bug #483443
  2. Comment #24

Comment 24 for bug 483443

Revision history for this message
In , Roc-ocallahan (roc-ocallahan) wrote :

I agree we want to retain the separate dynamically loaded "GNOME module" that we have now. XPCOM generally sucks, but here it seems to be reasonably well-suited so I don't think we need to rip it out.

I'm not sure if we're ready to drop gnome-vfs support completely. With which GTK versions is GIO normally available?

Would it make sense to abstract out the common stuff from gnome-vfs and GIO into a common superinterface, so that it's easy for code to try GIO and gnome-vfs and use whichever one is available?

Thanks!!!