> Thanks for the -geode clarifications. That one is OK with me then.
>
>> > nsc debdiff: same like above, but amplified by 10. Adding new packages
>> > (-dbg), changing the build system, changing config.{guess,sub} are
>> > things which are inappropriate for an SRU.
>
>> I'm sorry, but I cannot work with the XSF scripts.
>
> That means what? You need help from Bryce or Timo to backport just the
> relevant fixes or to revert the irrelevant packaging changes?
If they can just revert the Debian auto-generagtion patch and install
the static nsc.id, yes, that would work too.
> Thanks for the -geode clarifications. That one is OK with me then.
>
>> > nsc debdiff: same like above, but amplified by 10. Adding new packages
>> > (-dbg), changing the build system, changing config.{guess,sub} are
>> > things which are inappropriate for an SRU.
>
>> I'm sorry, but I cannot work with the XSF scripts.
>
> That means what? You need help from Bryce or Timo to backport just the
> relevant fixes or to revert the irrelevant packaging changes?
If they can just revert the Debian auto-generagtion patch and install
the static nsc.id, yes, that would work too.