Would it be possible to consider staging these changes only _after_
the current Xen package in focal/unapproved lands in focal-updates?
(It's a small FTBFS fixup for focal-proposed that is already 7+ days.)
Even though it's certainly welcome to have such a nice contribution
from a security perspective as this bug/debdiff, it's certainly big,
and there's always risk of regressions, as with any upload material.
Thus, as the current upload (focal-proposed + focal/unapproved queue)
is much smaller in scope and risk, it'd seem reasonable to land those
first, just in case an issue pops up with these larger changes, so
there's a way back/downgrade that still has the other/smaller fixes.
Hi Eduardo / Security team,
Would it be possible to consider staging these changes only _after_
the current Xen package in focal/unapproved lands in focal-updates?
(It's a small FTBFS fixup for focal-proposed that is already 7+ days.)
Even though it's certainly welcome to have such a nice contribution
from a security perspective as this bug/debdiff, it's certainly big,
and there's always risk of regressions, as with any upload material.
Thus, as the current upload (focal-proposed + focal/unapproved queue)
is much smaller in scope and risk, it'd seem reasonable to land those
first, just in case an issue pops up with these larger changes, so
there's a way back/downgrade that still has the other/smaller fixes.
Thanks!