Log in / Register
Ubuntu
unoconv package
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #1108921
Comment #4
Comment 4 for bug 1108921
Revision history for this message
dag (dag-wieers)
wrote
on 2013-11-07
:
#4
Well, even in January of this year unoconv 0.4 would have been considered old ;-)
Well, even in January of this year unoconv 0.4 would have been considered old ;-)
Well, even in January of this year unoconv 0.4 would have been considered old ;-)