Comment 14 for bug 1274087
Revision history for this message
|
|
#14 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
2eb648a
demo site
(Get the code!)
Actually I am ready to reopen if you explain me what exactly would you like me to fix. The x11 (xev) events are absolutely identical - that is the limit of xk-c responsibility, for properly written SW. Is that ok with everybody?
If that's the case, the software is using some other information from XKB config - which is should not, I guess
Returning to the previous version of F10 definition is not an option because it had clearly broken semantics of things like Shift-F10.
So, what would you propose to do?