Andreas , that is very reasonable. I found a better solution after I created patches.
Would it be an acceptable solution if the fileOwner setting is removed from /etc/rsyslog.d/tomcat9.conf and su setting is removed from /etc/logrotate.d/tomcat9 file which are shipped with tomcat9 package?
This would let rsyslog to create files with syslog:adm permissions in ubuntu and root:adm in Debian (as rsyslog runs as root there). This is what some other packages have if you want to check for a good example. It might be that, this way a delta could be avoided.
Andreas , that is very reasonable. I found a better solution after I created patches.
Would it be an acceptable solution if the fileOwner setting is removed from /etc/rsyslog. d/tomcat9. conf and su setting is removed from /etc/logrotate. d/tomcat9 file which are shipped with tomcat9 package?
This would let rsyslog to create files with syslog:adm permissions in ubuntu and root:adm in Debian (as rsyslog runs as root there). This is what some other packages have if you want to check for a good example. It might be that, this way a delta could be avoided.