(In reply to comment #101)
> (From update of attachment 320002 [details])
> Marking obsolete as this isn't something that ever would be approved for the
> branch.
Why not? Is Mozilla only concerned about security bugs on branch, and ignores all the others?
(In reply to comment #101)
> (From update of attachment 320002 [details])
> Marking obsolete as this isn't something that ever would be approved for the
> branch.
Why not? Is Mozilla only concerned about security bugs on branch, and ignores all the others?