Comment 35 for bug 2004480

Revision history for this message
In , Sancus (sancus) wrote :

(In reply to Kai Engert (:KaiE:) from comment #30)
> Just a drive-by thought, without having dug into this problem:
>
> The patch from that bug is probably too big for uplift to mozilla-esr102, and it also had regression bugs.
>
Yes, I don't think uplifting that one is going to happen.
> Adalbert's comment 29 suggests one specific code block to be related.

Yeah, Sean and I found that code earlier. We could patch only that block ourselves the way you suggested or by applying a patch during the build process. A JS workaround would be preferred, however, so we're still investigating that.