(In reply to comment #5)
> In my case, it's against the policy of the IT department to modify and/or
> delete the reply headers of the original message. But with ThunderBird the
> headers are not included in the first place. So, I can't use it at work.
Just for information. ThunderBird is not deleting any header information.
It is keeping all headers properly as real headers in mail itself.
But I agree as suggested by Vladimir there should be options to
include/exclude inline text headers also.
PS:policy makers of the IT department are idiots.
If they realy want any kind of integerity
they should insist on signed mails and ask for
forward as attachemnt instead of reply all.
also the outlook fooling them by doing as they expected
(In reply to comment #5)
> In my case, it's against the policy of the IT department to modify and/or
> delete the reply headers of the original message. But with ThunderBird the
> headers are not included in the first place. So, I can't use it at work.
Just for information. ThunderBird is not deleting any header information.
It is keeping all headers properly as real headers in mail itself.
But I agree as suggested by Vladimir there should be options to
include/exclude inline text headers also.
PS:policy makers of the IT department are idiots.
If they realy want any kind of integerity
they should insist on signed mails and ask for
forward as attachemnt instead of reply all.
also the outlook fooling them by doing as they expected