(In reply to comment #103) > (In reply to comment #100) ... > It will be nice to see this patch land. Thanks.
(In reply to comment #109) > we'd consider a patch for this. >
??? What became of this and the other patch?
(In reply to comment #106) ... > so I thought I'd toss this rumor in the pot ;o) > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331924
That was fixed on trunk. This is on "unspecified". Can we get that "unspecified" changed to either branch, trunk, or all (both?)?
Thanks.
(In reply to comment #103)
> (In reply to comment #100)
...
> It will be nice to see this patch land. Thanks.
(In reply to comment #109)
> we'd consider a patch for this.
>
??? What became of this and the other patch?
(In reply to comment #106) /bugzilla. mozilla. org/show_ bug.cgi? id=331924
...
> so I thought I'd toss this rumor in the pot ;o)
>
> https:/
That was fixed on trunk. This is on "unspecified". Can we get that "unspecified" changed to either branch, trunk, or all (both?)?
Thanks.