Can't the ubuntu maintainers simply backport that patch to the oneiric version? It's a simple fix, and the ubuntu packages seem to backport fixes regularly, so why not here, too? http://rkhunter.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/rkhunter/rkhunter/files/rkhunter?r1=1.405&r2=1.406&sortby=date
Right now, I get daily mails from all my machines about this false positive, which highly increases the chance that I miss it when a real problem appears, because simply deleting those false positives has become a habbit...
Cheers, Reinhold
Can't the ubuntu maintainers simply backport that patch to the oneiric version? rkhunter. cvs.sourceforge .net/viewvc/ rkhunter/ rkhunter/ files/rkhunter? r1=1.405& r2=1.406& sortby= date
It's a simple fix, and the ubuntu packages seem to backport fixes regularly, so why not here, too?
http://
Right now, I get daily mails from all my machines about this false positive, which highly increases the chance that I miss it when a real problem appears, because simply deleting those false positives has become a habbit...
Cheers,
Reinhold