Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Anthony Liguori<email address hidden> wrote:
>
>> If no-kvmclock helps, it's possible to disable this in the host kernel.
>>
>
> Anthony-
>
> What's the downside of no-kvmclock, if we decided to make this a
> default in the Ubuntu server kernel?
>
> :-Dustin
>
Assuming it worked? Potentially greater time drift in the guest.
Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Anthony Liguori<email address hidden> wrote:
>
>> If no-kvmclock helps, it's possible to disable this in the host kernel.
>>
>
> Anthony-
>
> What's the downside of no-kvmclock, if we decided to make this a
> default in the Ubuntu server kernel?
>
> :-Dustin
>
Assuming it worked? Potentially greater time drift in the guest.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori