Comment 11 for bug 531310
Revision history for this message
| Asterix Gaulês (asterixgaules) wrote | #11 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
9199653
demo site
(Get the code!)
It seems that the bug is in the CPU time calculation for the process. Some samples display a smaller time than the previous sample, thus resulting in negative CPU % for that period, which explains the overflow value that appears (9999.0)