bind9 in bionic at least detects nic changes and does not need to be reloaded.
Interface being removed:
Mar 28 13:59:04 bionic-bind9 named[7098]: no longer listening on 192.168.122.138#53
Interface being added:
Mar 28 13:59:04 bionic-bind9 named[7098]: listening on IPv4 interface ens7, 192.168.122.186#53
Removed again:
Mar 28 14:00:40 bionic-bind9 named[7098]: no longer listening on 192.168.122.186#53
Mar 28 14:00:40 bionic-bind9 systemd-networkd[8515]: ens7: Lost carrier
Mar 28 14:00:40 bionic-bind9 systemd-networkd[8515]: ens7: DHCP lease lost
The file the package has in /etc/network/if-up.d/bind9 is a noop. We can drop it, but that would add a delta with debian. I think it's not necessary to take any action.
How would you prefer the bind9 bug task be handled in this bug, given the above?
bind9 in bionic at least detects nic changes and does not need to be reloaded.
Interface being removed:
Mar 28 13:59:04 bionic-bind9 named[7098]: no longer listening on 192.168.122.138#53
Interface being added:
Mar 28 13:59:04 bionic-bind9 named[7098]: listening on IPv4 interface ens7, 192.168.122.186#53
Removed again: networkd[ 8515]: ens7: Lost carrier networkd[ 8515]: ens7: DHCP lease lost
Mar 28 14:00:40 bionic-bind9 named[7098]: no longer listening on 192.168.122.186#53
Mar 28 14:00:40 bionic-bind9 systemd-
Mar 28 14:00:40 bionic-bind9 systemd-
The file the package has in /etc/network/ if-up.d/ bind9 is a noop. We can drop it, but that would add a delta with debian. I think it's not necessary to take any action.
How would you prefer the bind9 bug task be handled in this bug, given the above?