Lena, based on the history here, is there a reason we don't want to go ahead with releasing 2.5.8 which has been in -proposed for a while and has had some user testing, before moving to 2.5.9?
If the changes in 2.5.9 are safe and appropriate, the subset of changes in 2.5.8 should be safer, right?
Lena, based on the history here, is there a reason we don't want to go ahead with releasing 2.5.8 which has been in -proposed for a while and has had some user testing, before moving to 2.5.9?
If the changes in 2.5.9 are safe and appropriate, the subset of changes in 2.5.8 should be safer, right?