Alexander Sack <email address hidden> writes:
> So how do we want this fixed? is -d ok or too much output as well?
-d is too much in ordinary circumstances.
I think it would be best if it was configurable, say with a command
line flag to network manager or a config file change. That way, it
would be possible to run without heavy debugging output most of the
time, and to turn up the level when one needs it.
In general, network manager relies far too much on hard coded
behaviors. It should be invoking scripts and following user supplied
configuration files. However, fixing this fully is beyond the scope of
the current bug report.
Alexander Sack <email address hidden> writes:
> So how do we want this fixed? is -d ok or too much output as well?
-d is too much in ordinary circumstances.
I think it would be best if it was configurable, say with a command
line flag to network manager or a config file change. That way, it
would be possible to run without heavy debugging output most of the
time, and to turn up the level when one needs it.
In general, network manager relies far too much on hard coded
behaviors. It should be invoking scripts and following user supplied
configuration files. However, fixing this fully is beyond the scope of
the current bug report.
Perry