Juju: 2.4.1
MAAS: 2.3.3
Ubuntu: 18.04 with latest updates
Relatively simple four machine deployment; machines have connectivity via two physical nics, on with two spaces configured, and the second with just a single space configured (see cloud-init-netplan.yaml for provisioned information).
I think I'm seeing a race between juju reworking the base netplan configuration with bridges, and LXD containers being started which results in a lack of bridges to two spaces on some machines (see
juju-98-netplan.yaml).
On machines where I see missing bridges I also see:
ubuntu@node-urey:/etc/netplan$ ls
50-cloud-init.yaml.bak.1533116635 98-juju.yaml 99-juju.yaml.bak.1533116651
Juju: 2.4.1
MAAS: 2.3.3
Ubuntu: 18.04 with latest updates
Relatively simple four machine deployment; machines have connectivity via two physical nics, on with two spaces configured, and the second with just a single space configured (see cloud-init- netplan. yaml for provisioned information).
I think I'm seeing a race between juju reworking the base netplan configuration with bridges, and LXD containers being started which results in a lack of bridges to two spaces on some machines (see netplan. yaml).
juju-98-
On machines where I see missing bridges I also see:
ubuntu@ node-urey: /etc/netplan$ ls init.yaml. bak.1533116635 98-juju.yaml 99-juju. yaml.bak. 1533116651
50-cloud-
vs
ubuntu@ node-hippalus: /etc/netplan$ ls init.yaml. bak.1533116584 98-juju. yaml.bak. 1533116791 99-juju.yaml 99-juju. yaml.bak. 1533116764 yaml.bak. 1533116618 98-juju. yaml.bak. 1533116845 99-juju. yaml.bak. 1533116602 99-juju. yaml.bak. 1533116818 yaml.bak. 1533116686 98-juju. yaml.bak. 1533116897 99-juju. yaml.bak. 1533116653 99-juju. yaml.bak. 1533116871 yaml.bak. 1533116738 98-juju. yaml.bak. 1533116954 99-juju. yaml.bak. 1533116712 99-juju. yaml.bak. 1533116925
50-cloud-
98-juju.
98-juju.
98-juju.
on one where the bridges have been configured (see juju-99- netplan. yaml).