On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:17:26AM -0700, Daniel Lakeland wrote:
> At the very least DHX authentication and/or ssl enabling libraries
> should be available in a seperate package netatalk-dhx and
> netatalk-ssl from nonus. Preferrably the whole thing should go back to
> nonus.
>
> Sebastian: are you now in the US? is that why the package changed?
It is not legally possible to reenable OpenSSL support at the moment.
This is due to the incompatible licenses of OpenSSL and Netatalk. (The
latter is under the GPL.) It is not related to the US export laws.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:17:26AM -0700, Daniel Lakeland wrote:
> At the very least DHX authentication and/or ssl enabling libraries
> should be available in a seperate package netatalk-dhx and
> netatalk-ssl from nonus. Preferrably the whole thing should go back to
> nonus.
>
> Sebastian: are you now in the US? is that why the package changed?
It is not legally possible to reenable OpenSSL support at the moment.
This is due to the incompatible licenses of OpenSSL and Netatalk. (The
latter is under the GPL.) It is not related to the US export laws.
- Sebastian