So I'm confused. You say it's an upstream Gnome issue. The desktop-icons developer says it's a Nautilus issue, since Nautilus handles folders. Issues 158 and 184 imply that Nautilus is not going to implement anything. Everyone is blaming everyone else. So who's really responsible?
So I'm confused. You say it's an upstream Gnome issue. The desktop-icons developer says it's a Nautilus issue, since Nautilus handles folders. Issues 158 and 184 imply that Nautilus is not going to implement anything. Everyone is blaming everyone else. So who's really responsible?