Comment 24 for bug 1698083
Revision history for this message
|
|
#24 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
513534c
demo site
(Get the code!)
(In reply to Adam Goode from comment #5)
> [...]
>
> Can extending the xdg-shell protocol to add raise/lower commands (and
> implementing in GDK) be considered a wayland-as-default blocker in Fedora?
> This is a regression though not in the default GNOME settings.
Not my call, but I hardly see how this could be a blocker to have Wayland by default.
If someone is willing to ignore the very explicit warning in the option description (comment #3), then the same person would likely be able to switch back to X11 if that's what (s)he really means.