(In reply to comment #20)
> Because it conceptually conflicts with a separate spidermonkey, assuming we
> keep the same .so and .pc names. And if you were just interested in consuming
> spidermonkey, why wouldn't you use /usr/lib/libmozjs.so.42 instead of being
> coupled to Firefox's /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.x/libmozjs.so?
Note that conceptually, you'd want a --with-system-js, but I'm already not convinced bug 618318 will actually work out, so I'm doubtful about having an up-to-date configure test.
(In reply to comment #20) libmozjs. so.42 instead of being xulrunner- 1.9.x/libmozjs. so?
> Because it conceptually conflicts with a separate spidermonkey, assuming we
> keep the same .so and .pc names. And if you were just interested in consuming
> spidermonkey, why wouldn't you use /usr/lib/
> coupled to Firefox's /usr/lib/
Note that conceptually, you'd want a --with-system-js, but I'm already not convinced bug 618318 will actually work out, so I'm doubtful about having an up-to-date configure test.