Log in / Register
Ubuntu
mdadm package
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #316670
Comment #22
Comment 22 for bug 316670
Revision history for this message
Steve Langasek (vorlon)
wrote
on 2009-03-27
:
#22
mdadm-316670.patch
Edit
(764 bytes, text/plain)
Looking at the backtrace + the upstream diff, I think the attached patch is the bit that fixes it.
Looking at the backtrace + the upstream diff, I think the attached patch is the bit that fixes it.
Looking at the backtrace + the upstream diff, I think the attached patch is the bit that fixes it.