Quoting Debian bug report:
"> It seems as if Redhat encountered and fixed this bug back in January: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554078
The original upstream bug fix was:
commit 3161e453e496eb5643faad30fff5a5ab183da0fe Author: Rusty Russell <email address hidden> Date: Wed Aug 26 12:22:32 2009 -0700
virtio: net refill on out-of-memory
which was included in Linux 2.6.31.
However, another fix was needed on top of that:
commit 39d321577405e8e269fd238b278aaf2425fa788a Author: Herbert Xu <email address hidden> Date: Mon Jan 25 15:51:01 2010 -0800
virtio_net: Make delayed refill more reliable"
The latter commit didn't make it into 2.6.32.
Quoting Debian bug report:
"> It seems as if Redhat encountered and fixed this bug back in January: /bugzilla. redhat. com/show_ bug.cgi? id=554078
>
> https:/
The original upstream bug fix was:
commit 3161e453e496eb5 643faad30fff5a5 ab183da0fe
Author: Rusty Russell <email address hidden>
Date: Wed Aug 26 12:22:32 2009 -0700
virtio: net refill on out-of-memory
which was included in Linux 2.6.31.
However, another fix was needed on top of that:
commit 39d321577405e8e 269fd238b278aaf 2425fa788a
Author: Herbert Xu <email address hidden>
Date: Mon Jan 25 15:51:01 2010 -0800
virtio_net: Make delayed refill more reliable"
The latter commit didn't make it into 2.6.32.