(In reply to Patrik Kullman from comment #106)
> Created attachment 257591 [details]
> dmesg with 4.13-rc1 + no_ec_wakeup
>
> I got the nice help from jsalisbury from #ubuntu-kernel IRC to build me a
> kernel with the patch
> (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1705099) and I'm happy
> to say that it works perfectly!
>
> Attaching the dmesg and the last suspend/resume was with keyboard wake on
> and no_ec_wakeup=Y.. and it slept through it all! :)
>
> Do as you please with the other patch, but please make the first one go into
> 4.13-rc2 :) This feels like the "perfect workaround" right now.
(In reply to Patrik Kullman from comment #106) /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ linux/+ bug/1705099) and I'm happy
> Created attachment 257591 [details]
> dmesg with 4.13-rc1 + no_ec_wakeup
>
> I got the nice help from jsalisbury from #ubuntu-kernel IRC to build me a
> kernel with the patch
> (https:/
> to say that it works perfectly!
>
> Attaching the dmesg and the last suspend/resume was with keyboard wake on
> and no_ec_wakeup=Y.. and it slept through it all! :)
>
> Do as you please with the other patch, but please make the first one go into
> 4.13-rc2 :) This feels like the "perfect workaround" right now.
Posted as https:/ /patchwork. kernel. org/patch/ 9850147/ and we'll see what happens.
I may need to make changes to it, so -rc2 may not be a realistic target, but I think the patch is fair enough in principle.