Comment 52 for bug 1445195

At some point it was believed that bug 1454758 was a duplicate of this bug. Or that this patch set would also fix bug
1454758. See comment #5. However, this original purpose of this bug was to get storage driver performance updates into Vivid.

The current testing seems to be more specific to bug 1454758 and is focused on backup failures and not the performance improvements.

Maybe we should spit these two bugs back apart so the patches listed in the original description can be tested to measure the performance improvement?

Then we can focus on getting the backup issue resolved and tested back in bug 1454758

It's good to hear the patches do what is expected per comment #47. I'll start the SRU process for Vivid. I'll also looking into building another Utopic test kernel since it's failing to boot.