Maurs, regarding your comments https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1069707/comments/28 : >"I come back to 3.2.0-32-generic #51 kernel (patched with vaio-full-3.2.2.patch, see link above). Suspend work great."
With 3.2.0-32-generic #51, if you remove the vaio-full-3.2.2.patch, and both kernel parameters: acpi_backlight=vendor acpi_sleep=nonvs
is suspend successful? If not, which combination of the above specifically allowed suspend to work and which did not?
Maurs, regarding your comments https:/ /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ linux/+ bug/1069707/ comments/ 28 : 3.2.2.patch, see link above).
>"I come back to 3.2.0-32-generic #51 kernel (patched with vaio-full-
Suspend work great."
With 3.2.0-32-generic #51, if you remove the vaio-full- 3.2.2.patch, and both kernel parameters: vendor
acpi_backlight=
acpi_sleep=nonvs
is suspend successful? If not, which combination of the above specifically allowed suspend to work and which did not?