On 10/17/12, Greg Faith <email address hidden> wrote:
> Lars it would appear you have found a clear distinction that makes since on
> some of the issues. In my original bug filing I did not clearly state I
> also was doing an "Alternate Install (Guided)" when I got the failure I
> basically stopped testing the alternate after the crash. Instead you
> started with the alternate entire drive installs. Perhaps that will help
> narrow the scope on the fix.
I read in some engineering books that the optimum testing team is
about 5 people. You need a number of people because each one will
pick up new things, but above a threshold they start to become
redundant.
On 10/17/12, Greg Faith <email address hidden> wrote:
> Lars it would appear you have found a clear distinction that makes since on
> some of the issues. In my original bug filing I did not clearly state I
> also was doing an "Alternate Install (Guided)" when I got the failure I
> basically stopped testing the alternate after the crash. Instead you
> started with the alternate entire drive installs. Perhaps that will help
> narrow the scope on the fix.
I read in some engineering books that the optimum testing team is
about 5 people. You need a number of people because each one will
pick up new things, but above a threshold they start to become
redundant.
regards,
/Lars